|
|
Welcome to
the Fellow Traveler Gear Blog. I do not consider myself
the final word on any piece of gear, supplier,
manufacturer, or technician discussed in this blog. But,
I will report, as honestly as I can, my experiences with
the mechanical aspects of my boat , her equipment, and
maintenance. These comments derive from (as of this
writing) over 5 years aboard Fellow Traveler,
15 years of living aboard 3 different boats and cruising
extensively, and a lifetime of sailing. I hope it may be
of value to others. This is a work in progress: as
continue my sailing adventures, I am sure I will have new
additions to both my love and my hate pile!
BOAT
I
will start with my boat, a Morgan 461. For those who did
know (as I did not), the 462 is not a later version: it
is the ketch rig. Most of the sloop rigged boats were
built for Moorings Charter in the Caribbean . The ketches, to my knowledge, were all for
private owners versions. The hull is based on the Scheel
45, designed by Henry Scheel, of which I believe only 6 were made. Indeed, the 461
is only 45 ft on deck, despite the name. Morgan acquired
the mold, and molded Morgan 452's in 1978, which are
pretty much the same boat as the Scheel 45. All of these
were ketch-rigged, I believe. The differences between the 45/452 and the 461/462 that I note
are these: On the 462 (ketch rig) the main
mast is stepped further aft in the same location as the
sloop rig. This causes the rig to look a little
"unbalanced" to my eye, with the large foretriangle and small main. Instead of a low coach
roof, the 45l/452 had more of doghouse with fixed
windows and a heavily cambered deck forward for headroom
in the V-berth cabin. Morgan added 1/2 foot to the keel with the
461/462. The 461/462 was designed for life in the
tropics, i.e., extensive hatches and ports for
ventilation. The charter version had several concessions
to their intended purpose, such as upper/lower
bunks in the passageway vs. the workbench, and a master
stateroom bunk that works as two twins fore and aft, or
an athwartship double vs. just the double with more
cabinetry. Also, there is access to the aft head from
the passageway as well as the aft cabin. Personally, I
like the charter version. Too many cruising boats lack
good sea berths, particularly if sailing on the wind
(Eastern Caribbean sailing is mostly on the wind). I
turned the passageway bunks into a comfortable single
with tool storage under, thus gaining an excellent sea
bunk. The twin configuration in the aft cabin provides
ok sea bunks: I intend to eventually box in the space
under the shelf above the bunk. This will make the bunks
narrower, but you do not end up under the shelf, which
is claustrophobic. You also get some more storage. I
prefer the simplicity of the sloop rig over the ketch.
A few other
quick comments on the layout: the walk-in engine room
provides superb access to the mechanicals, and keeps
them all in one area. As someone who hates engine work
this reduces my excuses to not do it. On the down side,
there is no sound-proofing, and it would be hard to
install with all the wires, equipment, etc. mounted on
the bulkheads of the engine room. A friend considered adding a
separate sound-proofed engine box inside the engine room, which
would be a clever solution, but I have a simpler one. Turn off the engine and sail.
The galley
is bigger than any equivalent-sized boat I know of
except those that put the galley in the passageway, not
an idea I like. The fridge, BTW, was terrible. Best to
cut it open and build a much smaller, better one inside.
The chart
table is nice and big, but the seat is rather
uncomfortable. But then, when was the last time
you sat at a chart table for hours reducing star
sights?
The aft
head (complete with bathtub!) will spoil you! It is the
size of those found in mega-yachts! Personally, I hate
phone-booth heads that lack a separate shower stall.
The level
of finish is ok. It does not jump out at you with the
superb craftsmanship of some boats. Personally, I no
longer care to sail around in something that resembles
my grandmothers armoire. I have endeavored to avoid the
"yachty" look the few times I've gotten in touch
with my interior decorator side.
As to
sailing ability, keep in mind this is not a race boat.
But, she performs surprisingly well for a pure cruising
boat. She does not sail very close to the wind. The main
reason is the jib sheeting angle: the shrouds lead to
chainplates bolted to the outside of the hull. I think
this is by far the best approach for chainplates for a
cruising boat, but with a 13.5 ft beam, any jib that
overlaps can not be sheeted in enough to sail close to
the wind. Her hull shape does not help either, with a
longish keel that is only 6 ft deep (6 1/2 actual for Fellow
Traveler when loaded for cruising). I suspect windward ability would be
greatly improved if a blade jib was used that sheeted
inside the shrouds. I considered this option, but chose
to go instead with a blade staysail: in a good sailing
breeze, she will sail much higher than before, but if
wind gets light, speed drops without more sail area. The
blade jib would be a great option for someone who is not
crossing oceans. People are finally realizing that a
huge genny just is not a friendly cruising sail. For off
the wind, buy a cruising chute or Code 0 on a removable
furler.
On
a reach, Fellow Traveler is as fast as all but the racing sleds. The
former owner supposedly won a St Croix to St John
race once in her (almost always a fast reach the whole
way). Down wind, again, as fast as anything except the
sleds. All boats are compromises.
I really
like the Peterson 44's. (hate the iron ballast, though.
So stupid. Iron and salt water are just a bad
combination). They will probably out sail the
Morgan, particularly in light wind and upwind. But, for
similar-sized boats, the galley and heads seem small. If
sailing performance is more important, find a good deal
on a Peterson . Just make sure you never go below on a
Morgan....don't want you to doubt your decision.
Anyone
looking at these boats has probably found an extremely
negative website written by a surveyor. By all means,
read it and take it in to consideration. But, I have
found few of the problems he mentions on my boat.
The hull is
very heavily laid up. Good thing, as 25 years in
tropical waters led to extensive blistering on my boat.
I figure I ground out the thickness of a typical modern
hull, such as a Benneateau, and still had 2 more hull
thicknesses left! From cores I have drilled to add
through-hulls, the layup quality is not great. there are
some dry spots. If it were not for the serious
overkill on the amount of fiberglass, I might be
worried, but there is so much there, it does not concern
me.
By the way,
Many people think steel is a more solid material than
fiberglass, and has a better chance of surviving a
reef-grounding, collision, etc. Maybe. We open steel
cans all the time with a not very sharp cutting
instrument (and coral reefs can be sharp!). I will tell
you a quick story about fiberglass. In 2002 I was
in Porto Santo, near Madeira, having arrived in the dark
after 8 days from the Azores. I was anchored in the
small boat anchorage just off the beach and by the
walled-in port. While I was in town buying ice cream and
beer (8 day at sea!), a local boat t-boned my boat at
full speed. The local boat was a massively built
reproduction of the traditional sailing cargo vessels
that hauled freight on the open Atlantic from Madeira to
Porto Santo. It was around 65 feet long, with a bow
probably 15 feet off the water so he could not see my
low boat (don't know why he missed the mast. Perhaps it
had something to do with the skimpy European bathing
suits on the beach on a holiday weekend). The
harbor master, who witnessed the collision from the
road, said he thought it would go right through my boat,
cutting it in half and sinking it. The captain on
another boat in the
anchorage rushed up on deck to see what was happening
because he heard my anchor chain being drug across the
bottom at 8 knots. My boat, by the way, was a 1962
Pearson Alberg 35, one of the early fiberglass
production boats. It was heavily laid up (but not the 2+
inches some claim. The bow sections could oil-can
disturbingly in rough seas). Did it sink? No. Did it
cause major damage? No. It put a hole in the hull/deck
joint about three inches across, with a crack running
down the hull maybe 6 inches. Fiberglass, in adequate
thicknesses is very tough stuff!
Back to the
Morgan. All in all, if I were to hire a designer to come
up with the perfect boat in this size range, I honestly
can think of few changes I would make. Maybe move the electrical
panel so you could get a comfortable seat at
the chart table. Maybe squeeze a little more foot room
into the V-berth. I have wondered about her relatively
modest amount of ballast. She does have large tanks in
the keep above the ballast, so maybe that helps. I can
not say I have found her tender, nor would I second
guess Henry Scheel. Moving the chainplates inboard would
help the sheeting angle, and thus the windward
performance. But, then I would need a double-spreader
rig, and chainplates that penetrate the deck are a
constant source of leaks and crevice corrosion. They
probably cause more dismastings than anything else (the
chainplates look perfect above and below deck, but where
they pass through the deck, they turn to swiss cheese). Not sure the complexity and cost are worth the
gain. Sail downwind instead! I guess I am happy. I
could easily spent 5 times as much and not get a boat I
like as much.
On to gear.
SAILS
I had a jib
and a staysail built for me by SAILS EAST,
ordering through John Ward, their NW US rep.
There were problems when they arrived. Honestly, I have
never ordered a sail, through a local sailmaker or
elsewhere, in which there were not some issues, so I can
not say Sails East was significantly better or worse.
John Ward is very knowledgeable, and great to deal
with, and went to bat for me to fix the problem (wrong
size luff tape) . I do think, though, I was a bit
more impressed with the workmanship from Rolly Tasker,
in Thailand (main for my last boat). Of course, that was
10 years ago, so may not be the same. The US rep for
Tasker, National Sails, in FL never did make good on
that sails problem (mast slides on foot and vice
versa, and non-reusable attachments for them, so had to
buy extra slides and new plastic shackles. Do not know
if the problem was caused by him or the loft). In view
of his unwillingness to resolve this problem
despite promising to do so, I would never order a sail
from National again.
RIGGING
I have
ordered extensively over the years from RIGGING ONLY (www.riggingonly.com)
and always had great service at great prices. I highly
recommend them for all rigging needs, including prices
for new winches cheaper than Ebay used. They are very
knowledgeable if you need rigging advice.
MARINE
CHANDLERIES
ISLAND
WATER WORLD and BUDGET MARINE: The
Eastern Caribbean has two main chandlery chains that
compete strongly for business, so it is actually an ok
place to supply. Best deal is to use cash in St Martin
at whichever has the best price. Next best is the
islands that have one of each store: Grenada and Saint
Thomas. On big items, get them bidding against each
other.
DEFENDER
INDUSTRIES: supposedly a marine chandlery, but
actually a den of thieves. I do not order from them no
matter how much cheaper they may be, because in the end
it will cost you. They mailed an order that I had
cancelled 6 months before because I was leaving the
country (the items had been in stock, they just never
mailed it for some reason only known to them). I
returned the package AT MY COST (not easy to do from a
foreign country when it is at an address you no longer
live at!), yet never was credited. My bank said
write them with the details, but claim they never received
the multiple letters I sent from various
foreign countries. Ask around among long-term boaties and
you will quickly find similar stories. Their reputation
is terrible. If you still insist on ordering from
them, DON'T SAY I DIDN'T WARN YOU!
MARINE
STOVES:
Best deal
going: New Princess stoves from The Stove Doctor (ultimateaccuracy@aol.com,
or GEARBUSTERS on Ebay). He also is your
source for parts for old stoves, even parts the
manufacturer no longer carries. But, while the Princess
is much cheaper than a Force 10, I recently did an
Atlantic delivery on a boat equipped with a Force 10 and
think it is a superior stove. I have also captained a
charter catamaran with an Eno stove and hate it: the
burners are so wimpy it takes half an hour to boil
water. The oven is not thermostatically controlled and
the "control" provides little variation in temperature.
A stove without a thermostat, but a built-in thermometer
readable from the outside and a good control would be
good, but I do not see those anymore.
RADAR DETECTOR
the CARD
(Collision Avoidance Radar Detector),
from Survival Safety Engineering, is an essential piece of gear to me,
particularly for a singlehander. From when it is first
visible, you have about 15 minutes to spot a ship
at speed before you are going to be running out of time
to contact it or maneuver out of it's way. Genny poled
out? Move fast! No main up, so can't turn upwind much?
Move faster! The CARD gives you that extra edge of
warning, and lets you sleep, even if you do not entirely
trust the person on watch. And, it draws milliamps. Not
for coastal sailing, but open ocean. I used one on my
last boat, on which I singlehanded the Atlantic. I added
one to Fellow Traveler as well as I never know when my
crew might abandon me (or I throw them off!).
AIS is a good
alternative to radar detectors so long as it can be
hooked to an alarm. Radars seem like a good solution,
but they just draw too much power and have too many
false alarms to really work as a an alarm when
off-watch, IMO.
SELF
STEERING AND AUTOPILOTS
First,
everyone sitting on land dreaming of sailing thinks they
are going to cross oceans. Most I know here in the
Caribbean thought they would, but never do. Here, where
passages are short. a good Self Steering device or a
good Autopilot will suffice, but both are not needed.
You can add the other later before you actually start
that ocean passage. But, if going bluewater sailing,
Jimmy Cornell says he thinks you need both, and I
agree.
My
AUTOPILOT is a SIMRAD (formerly Robertson) AP 11.
Not many bells and whistles, but I don't need them. Just
steer the course! I have no complaints about this gear.
It was recommended by "Mac" MacNeil, who
helped me install it (see below). He has dealt with
most, if not all types, so I respect his opinion. I
know, everyone else is going RayMarine. Well, I listen
to Mac. Since then I have captained two boats with
RayMarine autopilots, and I am very thankful I had Mac's
advice! It does not compare to the Simrad.
If you are
anywhere near the US Virgin Islands, and have autopilot
or major electrical issues, contact James
"Mac" MacNeil (usvitechnical@yahoo.com).
He is good, he is honest, and her is reasonable.
SELF
STEERING: I have used a very beat, old RGV, a somewhat
beat Aries, and now, a brand new HYDROVANE (www.hydrovane.co.uk).
I could get all three to steer my boat, albeit with
varying amounts of finagling. The Hydrovane has yet to
be completely tested, but so far, it seems to be the
best (keep in mind, it is new). I just mounted it last
year, yet I have
already sailed for several days close reaching in light
air without touching it (I would adjust the main wheel
slightly to balance the boat as wind varied). I have
used it in ocean swells on a beam reach in moderate
winds (neither windvane
could do that on my last boat, but that could have been
the boat more than the vane). The Hydrovane also steered
down wind in moderate to strong winds with a fairly
large quartering sea from Curacao to Cartagena, a
notoriously rough bit of sea. And in all these
situations, it steered superbly. It has yet to be tested
in gales or stronger, but then, it would not bother me
if it does not get the opportunity! Both the RGV and the
Hydrovane serve as emergency rudders. I used the RGV as
one once when my tiller on my Alberg broke at the
base. The Aries does not serve as emergency
steering.
Honestly, for most boats,
you could not go wrong with a used Aries. Get spare parts
and rebuild it if need be. But, for my situation, this would
not have worked. I have hydraulic steering, which means
there is not a fixed center point to the wheel. Also.
with the center-cockpit, the lines to the wheel would be
long, leading to friction and stretch. And, the high
freeboard of my boat might make mounting it difficult or
impossible. Perhaps the biggest concern, the
steering and autopilot both work through the hydraulic
system. If it failed, I would only have an emergency
tiller in the aft cabin to steer by. The Hydrovane is the perfect solution in
every way but one: IT IS CRAZY EXPENSIVE!. In fact, it
is the single most expensive piece of boat gear I have
ever bought. It cost more than my first cruising boat
did! All I can say is, now I have to cross an ocean just
to justify it!
WATERMAKER
3 years ago
I installed a Little Wonder Watermaker by VILLAGE
MARINE on Fellow Traveler. For most of this
time, I was a huge booster of Village Marine. Until this
summer (2007), when I needed a new membrane. I contacted
the company, and they said it cost $500. I looked at my
manual, and it gave the model number and specs. of what
membrane I needed. And, it turns out that model is a
standard part, made my most membrane makers, and selling
for less than 1/2 what Village Marine was asking. Or so
I thought, The manual was wrong. I need a
"special" membrane that is two inches shorter
than the one specified in my manual. I don't know, but I
suspect that when Village Marine started making their
own membranes, they intentionally made them 2 inches
shorter than the standard ones so they could charge you
more than twice as much. When I pointed out the clear
error in the manual, they dropped the price a whopping
$25 over what I could order it for through one of their
reps. Never even apologized for what I think is a major
screw-up on their part. Not the kind of treatment of
customers I look for in a company.
I no longer
recommend Village Marine. If I were buying a watermaker
today, I would ABSOLUTELY shop around a
lot more. And, I would ask any company whose watermaker I
was considering whether they use standard membranes or
some proprietary model, and what they charge for
replacements. You might find that the watermaker that
cost a few bucks more to purchase saves you a lot down
the road. Caveat emptor.
BOATYARDS
Since
arriving in the Caribbean, I have hauled in boatyards in
Puerto Rico, the US Virgin Islands, the British Virgin
Islands, and Carriacou. None were bad. INDEPENDENT
BOATYARD in St
Thomas is excellent, but expensive. But, the best?
Unquestionably TYRELL BAY YACHT HAULOUT in Carriacou.
The guys who own, run, and work in this yard are the
best! Their prices are reasonable, and they do not
attempt to nickel and dime you over everything they can.
It is a pleasant and safe place to be hauled as well.
There are two negatives that I will point out: their
bath facilities are pretty rough, and there chandlery is
modest. But, they can get any part available in Grenada
shipped in on the ferry within a couple of days at the
Catalogue price (cheaper than you pay in Grenada).
They also are more environmentally friendly than most
yards in the islands. If you want to move off the boat,
there are reasonable accommodations nearby (i.e. AC and
clean restrooms). As I write, I am about to haul there
for the third time. Did I mention that, when they took a
direct hit from hurricane Emily, they went to extreme
pains, adding extra chocks, moving boats from their
moorings into the mangrove hurricane hole, etc? Result?
Superficial damage only. That's the type of yard they
are.
Currently, Fellow
Traveler is stored in Shelter Bay Marina's
Boatyard in Colon, Panama. I will post my opinions of
this yard once my boat is launched and I am on my way
again. In the mean time, if you are heading that way and
want my opinion so far, by all means, email me.
MARINE
HEADS
One word
only: LAVAC. Buy them through ST BRENDAN'S
ISLE (see mail
service below). These heads are simple, do not leak, and
almost never need maintenance.
MAIL
SERVICE
I have used
ST BRENDAN'S ISLE (sbi@boatmail.com)
for 5 years now. They are not cheap. They are good. They
also rep Village Marine Watemakers and Lavac heads (see
above) as well as folding bikes, if I remember right.
WINDLASS
I bought a QUICK
WINDLASS from ISLAND WATER WORLD in St Martin
4 years ago. It was half the price of equivalent
competitors,
and worked nicely for the first two years. When I
purchased it, I thought the studs that connected the
above-deck part with the motor, and thus held the whole
windlass onto the boat seemed a bit undersized. Well,
this winter (08) they sheared off. I had a machine shop
drill old the broken studs and tap for larger ones, so
that should hold it, I hope. There has always been
a problem, when dropping the chain manually with an
occasional link coming up the chainpipe sideways and
getting jammed. This is less of a problem in the
power-down mode as it allows for a slow, steady decent
and gives the chain more time to shake out the kinks. If
I am still using this windlass in 10 years, then it will
have been a good purchase, so the jury is still out.
FRIDGE
No owner or
expert I have ever talked to recommended a DC holding
plate system. Read Nigel Calder's book on marine
refrigeration if you wonder why. Engine driven
coldplates are becoming much less common: I know no one
who has installed one in years. A friend, who installs
and repairs refrigeration on mega-yachts in St Martin
tells me the trend, even with mega-yachts, is 12-volt
dc: they will have a bank of WAACO (formerly Adler
Barbour) compressors. The reason? quiet operation, dependability, and redundancy.
Nearly every cruiser I know uses
the small dc units. I prefer Waaco as they have been
around the longest and are the most readily available in
my experience. I have the water-cooled option just
because the unit is installed in the engine room,
although one friend swears that so long as the temp is
under 110 degrees, air-cooling is fine. I figure, I can
turn it off or on as I want, since it works both ways.
If your installation space is cramped, go with
water-cooling, as airflow is essential otherwise. And, take the
time to build a good box, or nothing will work except a
generator and AC system!
Note on insulation: most people use polyurethane as it has the
highest R value, but this is a mistake. Polyurethane
rapidly looses R value if it becomes wet, and a fridge
will ultimately have moisture enter the insulation space
as vapor and condense into water as it gets colder
closer to the box. If you have lots of money and very
little space, use the vacuum panels. But, it would
almost be cheaper to buy a bigger boat! For the
rest of us, the stuff to use is Extruded Polystyrene (the blue
stuff they sell at most lumber yards) as it does not
absorb water so does not lose much R value due to
condensation. Then, do yourself a favor and seal you
insulation inside and out with fiberglass to minimize
the vapor that can penetrate. Oh, the hole for the
tubing? Cut the hole and fit a piece of PVC pipe and
glass it in. Then, use spray foam inside the PVC around
the tubes. This way, no moisture gets to the rest of the
insulation.
LIGHTING
My boat is
old enough it has lots of the simple screw in base
sockets that take bulbs that look like normal household
bulbs. These bulbs are terrible, sucking up juice for
little light. But hey! They now have 12V screw-in fluorescents
and they are great! If you don't have the
screw-in sockets, buy them from a home lighting place in
a style you like: it does not matter what the socket is,
only what voltage you hook up to it. Recently, LED
interior lighting has become possible, and may be the
next best thing.
BATTERIES
I have used
golf cart 6-volt batteries exclusively for my house bank
now on two boats, and think they are the best
value. My Alberg used two wired together into a 12 volt
bank. Fellow Traveler uses 6. Brand is less
important than freshness: a battery that has been
sitting on the shelf for 2 or more months without being
trickle-charged will never perform at full capacity. I
do not know if Chandleries are ignorant of proper
battery storage techniques or just assume the customer
is. Carry a volt-meter into the store with you and do
not accept any battery that is not showing near a full
charge. Use a supplier that supplies fresh batteries,
not old ones, or trickle-charges them. In St Thomas, USVI, contact CARIBBEAN BATTERY for the best
price and freshest batteries.
In Colon, there is
a shop, Casa de Bateria, which sells golf carts,
AGM's, etc, for the cruisers. The only problem is they
charge double the US price. Golf Carts are good in part
because you get a lot of battery for the money. But not
at Doubled Prices! Two 8-D's will fit in the same space
as 6 golf carts, and while this is only 2/3rds the
amp-hours, if they are 2/3rds the price, as they are at
Casa de Bateria, I would consider going this
route. My point is, in remote places, do not become too
locked into a particular style of battery. Instead,
figure out what will suit your needs at the cheapest
price.
With the ever-increasing
demands we place on our batteries, such as DC fridges,
radar, stereos, computers, etc, realize that a battery
is only as good as the system to charge it. Take the
time to learn about DC systems, or you will always have
dead batteries. You will need a high-amp alternator with
a smart regulator, and hopefully some means of
alternative power. Why live on a sailboat and yet still
need an endless supply of fossil fuels to sail? Go
alternative! But please, do not anchor anywhere near me
if you have one of those screechingly loud AIR MARINE
wind generators. Buy a KISS or one of the new
ones out of Europe that do not disturb the peace and
tranquility of paradise. While I like alternative
energy, if you already own a high-end AC charger, a
simple solution for bulk charging and equalizing your
batts is a portable gas generator putting out enough AC
to run the charger. Great for running power tools too!
Just make sure you buy one of the quiet ones!
PORTLIGHTS
Fellow
Traveler, like many boats of her vintage, came with
plastic ports. I found them problematic: if you never
opened them, they did not leak...but then why have
opening ports? Once opened, they would leak no matter
how tightly sealed, until a layer of grime
"sealed" them again. The plastic latches
break. They are usually not through-bolted, so, in a
knock-down, just might all pop out (well, in, actually).
So, I bit the bullet and bought 14 stainless ports from NEWFOUND
METALS (www.newfoundmetals.com). These things are so beautiful
they belong in a museum as sculpture! But be forewarned,
they are a pain in the stern to install! After 1 year, I
finally found time to install the last 6.
DEFENSIVE WEAPONS
OK, no doubt that
got your attention! Well, I do not cruise with guns. I
have heard all the arguments for and against, but
ultimately, it comes down to the laws where you travel.
If you declare your weapon, you may find you have to
leave it in your port of entry and return for it upon
checkout, not always easy in a long trade wind sail. If
it is a pistol, you may not have it returned. But that
does not mean you should be unarmed or unprepared. Think
alternatives.
Now, if someone
boards you with an Uzzi, forget defending yourself, just
give him what he wants. But this is rare. More often, he
is unarmed, or armed with a machete. So, locking steel
screens on ports and companionway would mean you are
safe. A Super Soaker filled with ammonia would
incapacitate him long enough to pitch him over the side.
Oven cleaner is more aggressive, possibly doing
permanent damage, but hey! so does a machete! On board,
rather than a super soaker, a household spray bottle of
ammonia set to shoot a stream could be kept next to your
berth and should hit an attackers eyes before they could get
you with a machete. If you ever got even a mild whiff of
Ammonia when pouring it into the bucket, you know a shot
in the face would basically shut someone down. And,
while a little might blow back with a breeze at you, it
is a liquid, not an aerosol, so does not have the
problems of firing pepper spray upwind, at least down
below.
It seems to me
there should be simple, 12v alarms for boats. I intend
to look into this possibility soon. A friend found
battery-operated motion detectors that have remote
sensors, so could put the sensor up in his cockpit and
have the alarm down below: Early Warning system! I think
he said he got them from that tool catalogue, Harbors
and Freight. Radio Shack and Home Depot have simple,
battery-operated alarms with motion sensors. Perhaps the
best deterrent I have is my anchor light, a LED with a
light sensor to turn it on at night. I leave it hanging
under the bimini where it is clearly visible to any
approaching vessels, yet also lights up the cockpit. It
takes a brave thief to enter a brightly-lit cockpit and
go down into a dark cabin not knowing who or what awaits
him. He would also be visible to any other boaters
peering out a hatch. Now, if I could just wire up a
light to a motion sensor, like the ones on houses....
Dinghies
First, most people
leave the US or Europe with too small of a dinghy. In
the Caribbean, and no doubt most of the rest of the
remote cruising grounds I usually prefer, you almost
always anchor out. Harbors are often large and open,
with a pretty good chop in them, so you want something
big enough to get you around without soaking you and
everything you are carrying in the dinghy. You want
something big enough to load with snorkel gear and your
friends from the boat next door, and get through some
open water to a great snorkeling reef. Nearly everyone
trades up once in the Caribbean. While they might buy
similar dinghies, American and European attitudes to
powering them are very different. Americans go for a 15.
Europeans usually go for a 5, or even a 2 (although this
is starting to change). And, more and more,
everyone is buying deflatables. I loved my Carib
12-footer with the 15hp. When I was in St John, I lived
several miles from town and worked as much as 7 days a
week, so this allowed me to get to shops and bars in the
evening without owning a car. But, it leaked air. I have
debated about buying a hard dinghy for years. Finally,
some thieves in Colon, Panama and a lack of money made
the decision for me. Before describing what I
built, let me give the pros and cons of the various
engines and boats, as I see them.
Inflatable: Pros:
very stable and safe, does not scar the mother ship when
coming alongside. Good loading capacity. Easy to secure
aboard for passages. Cons: Expensive, do not last, and
eventually need regular pumping, and usually pretty
heavy.
Hard Dinghy:
Depends a lot on the design, but: Pros: May be cheap,
and can be home built. Should last a lifetime if
properly built. Cons: needs padding to avoid scarring
the mother ship. Some are hard to enter from the
mother ship or the water. Can be hard to store aboard.
Big engine
(15hp+): Pros: you can cover ground fast. You can go
between nearby islands if it is on a seaworthy dinghy.
If your motor dies on your mother ship, a 15 hp on a
dinghy strapped to the side will move it around in a
pinch. Cons: Heavy, consumes more fuel, costs more, and
is more of a target for theft.
Small Engine
(5hp): Pros: Are you really in a hurry? When I use a
smaller motor, I discover that the trips are more
relaxing, so it does not seem slow even on a long
commute. Fuel efficient. Light and easy to handle, even
if you have to drag your dinghy up a long beach to get
above the high tide point. Cheap. Cons: A 5hp would move
my old Alberg 35, but not my current boat. If you load
several people and gear to go snorkeling it will slow
way down.
Now, let me tell
you about my new dinghy: it is a Spindrift 10, designed
by B&B designs. Here is the link to their site:
This dinghy is
designed for stitch and glue homebuilding out of
plywood. Due to no decent ply available in Colon, I
built mine out of sheets of fiberglass (click here to go
to my page for building stitch and glue fiberglass
boats). This dinghy can be built as a two-part nestling
dinghy that takes up very little deck space. It comes in
other sizes (up to 11 ft for nestling, up to 12 foot for
one piece). It is a bit beamier, particularly at the
waterline, than the pure rowing dinks like a Whitehall,
so probably does not row quite as nice, but should sail
and power much faster. More important, the stability it
derives from this means it is very easy to enter from my
high-freeboard boat or from the water. I find it easier
to enter from the water than my old inflatable, climbing
over the bow, which dips way down but does not come
close to letting water in. I weigh 210 pounds. When
snorkeling with some Kuna friends in Panama, who are
much leaner and smaller than I, they could climb over
the sides without them dipping.
I do not
like to row much as I have carpal tunnel syndrome and
tendonitis in my wrists, and this aggravates it. But,
when anchored in a small harbor, it is nice to have the
option to leave the motor stored, take a few strokes,
and be ashore. I NEVER rowed my 12 foot Carib (which
actually comes with paddles, not oars). With a 5hp
motor, the Spindrift planes easily with one person (a
tiller extension is needed so you can steer from
amidship, and I designed mine so I can adjust the seat
forward or back for best position for rowing or motoring
depending on conditions and load). Their website shows a
small person planing the Spindrift 10 with a 2hp! I
built my boat with additional freeboard, particularly in
the bow area, so it is very dry, even in rough
conditions. I have had three Kuna friends and myself
with our snorkel gear in it heading out into the open
waters of San Blas Bay to get to a distant reef to
snorkel and found it dry and comfortable.
I rode in a
friend's before building mine, and thought it was much
bigger than 10 feet. It has the carrying capacity of an
11 or 12 foot hard-bottomed inflatable, but weighs less
and needs a much smaller motor to get equivalent speeds.
I am considering, when I find the time and place,
building the 12-foot version as I often take 2 or more
crew with me when I sail, and occasionally charter my
boat. The extra space, capacity, and seaworthiness of
the longer boat would be nice when loaded. I would
seriously consider building it the same way again, as it
makes for a strong, light boat pretty cheap (I have
about $500 in the 10 footer).
|
|